Examining The Social Structure Theories In The Economy Criminology Essay

Examining The complaisant Structure Theories In The Economy Criminology Essay favorable structure theories swan that the disadvantaged economic signifier position is a primary possess of aversion. The theories realm that neighborhoods which are dismantle class force of strain, frustration and disarrangement that create crime (Shanali-Justicia). social Disorganization, Strain Theory and glossiness divergence are a few of the social structure criminology theories that are use to explain crime. Other social theories that fall into this category are Culture of Poverty and the actually disadvantage theory.The theory of social disorganization is that crime and delinquency is caused when communities fail. There is a breakdown of families, church, schools and government in the community. Social disorganization theorizes that these relationships reinforce positive behavior, a wizard of community duty and concern for the social network at bottom a close playing area (Hardy, 201 0). When these relationships breakdown or do not exist the communities and its inhabitants lose its sense of structure and this is deliberated to be the causation of crime and delinquent behavior. The turn of Social Disorganization is thought to start with poverty, where thither is inadequacy of opportunities and racial discrimination. The lack of opportunities breaks down the social institutions and organizations and this leads to the erosion of traditional value. This breakdown leads juveniles to seek the credence from peers and a sense of belonging from gangs. Once these gangs form there is a loss of social control or it plumps less effective. When this control is confounded neighborhoods start more prone to crime and this detracts from investors which reduces opportunities in the community. Eventually this becomes the average and this way of life is passed onto the next generation. The formation of felonious careers if formed and the cycle continues for some while early( a)s grow out of their delinquent phase.Populace in these disorganized areas can regain neglected, frustrated and ostracized from the economic mainstream, they develop feelings of desperation and anger which sociologist state are signs of strain (Siegel Welsch, 2008, p. 89). This strain develops and theorist state it leads people to transmit criminal offenses, because they lack the opportunities for success. The opportunity for a go bad life seems to be beyond their reach, so people turn to deviate behavior to achieve their goals because they feel that nightspot has let them down. Cultural departure Theory is a combination of both the effects of social disorganization and strain. It is thought that the lower socio-economic populaces create an independent subculture where they bring forth their own rules and values. Juveniles in lower class neighborhoods adapt to their surround, they become cynical and have no respect for authority. Conventional values make little sense to a youth whose role models may include gun runner, drug dealers and pimps (Siegel Welsch, 2008, p. 91). Teachers and other authority figures become secondary citizens to these juveniles and they cannot conform to the rules as other members of nine do. These juveniles experience a form of culture conflict as a result they never achieve their goals and eventually reap caught up in the life of gangs and deviant behavior.The populace of this poverty culture is marked by frustration of their environment. There is a lack of trust of police and government and this mistrust stalls people from this environment from seeking other discriminatory opportunities or ones that are available to them. The results of this environment are depression and perhaps psychological issues. Inner-cities that suffer from economic changes have an increase of crime they become ingrained in a cycle of poverty, unemployment and crime. These people are considered the truly disadvantage living in communities with p oorly organized social networks, estrange populations and high crime (Siegel Welsch, 2008, p. 85)Theorists such as Clifford Shaw, Henry McKay, and Robert Merton have equivalent views on social structure theories. While Elijah Anderson believed that juveniles committed crimes because of their socio-economic living conditions there were rendered incapable of achieving success (Siegel Welsch, 2008, p. 92). A juvenile turned to crime because it was their only when way of achieving success. They feel that their only option is to join gangs and engage in behavior that is deviant.Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay believe that delinquency is mainly the consequence of a collapse of institutional, community-based controls (Wong, 2009). Shaw and McKay believed that people that lived in situations such as these responded to the disorganization of their environment. They believe that delinquent behavior was a result of social disorganization, because the neighborhoods they lived in were transit ional neighborhoods. This was an area where there was a shift in population the fondness class neighborhood would transition to a mixture of lower class people. When this transition would occur the family would become rooted in the neighborhood and the values that they developed such as belonging to gangs and criminal behavior would be passed onto the next generation.Similar to Shaw and McKay, Robert Merton believe that fiat was the cause of deviant behavior, because family put pressure on people to achieve the American dream. Merton believed that society expected an individual to conform or either work within its structure. When a person cannot conform they become members of a deviant subculture. Merton argued that pep pill class children are less likely to commit delinquent acts because they have the mover and ability to obtain an education and stable employment. While lower class juveniles do not have the same means they feel the social and psychological strain or anomie. Me rton believed this condition caused juveniles to commit criminal acts to achieve their goals and even if they were offered the means to achieve these goals legally, they would reject those acceptable means of deviant ones (Siegel Welsch, 2008, p. 89).The theory that I most associate with my belief that juveniles commit crimes is the based Cultural Deviance theory. I think that juveniles conform to their environment and as a result have a lower gear up of goals and values than those of society. Juveniles that grow up in lower economic levels become hardened in their environment and develop an outer shell that shows no fear and have accepted because they play hard they will belike die young. These juveniles do not hesitate to use violence to get the message across nor do they consider the consequences of their actions. The goals that these juveniles set for themselves are reaching the top level in their gangs and increasing their drug sales. These juveniles cannot understand the idea of hard work and setting realistic goals like other members of society and because they fail to achieve success in life they are fast(a) to blame the man for their failures.